<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electric Vehicle Maker THINK&#8482; Resets for a New Start</title>
	<atom:link href="http://auto-report.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://auto-report.net/?p=6383</link>
	<description>News and Commentary on the Global Automotive Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:06:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Charles</title>
		<link>http://auto-report.net/?p=6383&#038;cpage=1#comment-11828</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://auto-report.net/?p=6383#comment-11828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears Think has as many lives as a cartoon cat. You have to ask, can Think survive without additional sources of revenue, or a parent company willing to subsidize the business? Venturi and Tesla not only charge much more for their EVs, they started converting an existing IC platform (Venturi&#039;s Fetish began as a gasoline-engine Elise rival, while Tesla&#039;s roadster was based on the Elise itself); and have crucial contracts to convert vehicles for larger manufacturers (PSA and Toyota respectively). More direct rivals Aixam-Mega and Polaris (the new owner of GEM) have profitable synergistic businesses selling IC-powered low-speed and off-road vehicles. Investing in Think may give Valmet an independent product line to compliment its contract manufacturing business. Ener1 gets a guaranteed outlet for its battery technology, but with demand for batteries growing, does it really need one? Bailing out Think could prove to be simply a big cash drain for both companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears Think has as many lives as a cartoon cat. You have to ask, can Think survive without additional sources of revenue, or a parent company willing to subsidize the business? Venturi and Tesla not only charge much more for their EVs, they started converting an existing IC platform (Venturi&#8217;s Fetish began as a gasoline-engine Elise rival, while Tesla&#8217;s roadster was based on the Elise itself); and have crucial contracts to convert vehicles for larger manufacturers (PSA and Toyota respectively). More direct rivals Aixam-Mega and Polaris (the new owner of GEM) have profitable synergistic businesses selling IC-powered low-speed and off-road vehicles. Investing in Think may give Valmet an independent product line to compliment its contract manufacturing business. Ener1 gets a guaranteed outlet for its battery technology, but with demand for batteries growing, does it really need one? Bailing out Think could prove to be simply a big cash drain for both companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
